![]() Indeed, as the authors state:ĭespite the large significance of the measurement reported here and the stability of the analysis, the potentially great impact of the result motivates the continuation of our studies in order to investigate possible still unknown systematic effects that could explain the observed anomaly. Thus, it is quite possible that there is some hidden effect that makes their error greater than the 14 billionths of a second that they report. However, this is a really complex experiment, and the measured time difference is really small. The error that they report is reasonable based on the design of their system and the tests that they have run. Thus, the time by which the neutrinos “beat” light is much larger than their maximum error, which makes the measurement something that must be taken seriously.ĭoes this mean the neutrinos were definitely moving faster than light? Not necessarily. That’s not a lot, but according to their detailed analysis, the system’s total error is about 14 billionths of a second. Specifically, light should have taken about 2.4 thousands of a second to get to the detector, but the neutrinos got there 60 billionths of a second sooner. So, assuming everything is working as expected, what did they find? They found that the neutrinos arrived at the detector just slightly earlier than light would have arrived there. However, if the system really is able to measure the time to within a few billionths of a second, there should be no problem. Now remember, the neutrinos take only about three thousandths of second to get there. Using both of these time-measuring devices in tandem gives them (theoretically) the ability to measure the neutrino travel time to within just a few billionths of a second. ![]() How do they correlate two things that happened 730 kilometers apart from one another? Well, they use both a Global Positioning System signal and an atomic clock. They need to know when some particles that are 730 kilometers away were formed and when they reached the detector. Even though they took great pains to measure the times as well as they could, I think that’s the weak point of their experiment. Measuring those two times is a bit tricky, however. The difference between those two times tells them how long it took for the neutrinos to travel from source to detector, which then allows them to determine their speed. After all, if the scientists are going to measure the velocity of the neutrinos, they need to know when the neutrinos are made and when they reach the detector. Most importantly, they seem to have taken great care in keeping track of time in their experiment. The scientists have published an initial version of their paper, and it is impressive. It sits 730 kilometers away from the source of the neutrinos it is detecting, and those neutrinos generally take about three thousandths of a second to travel from the source to the detector. In this experiment, the neutrinos are detected by an underground system called OPERA (Oscillation Project with Emulsion-tRacking Apparatus), which is made up of about 150,000 bricks of photographic emulsion film stacked in between lead plates. ![]() That’s probably the most overlooked part of the story!įirst, you need to know that the particles being studied are called neutrinos, and they are maddeningly hard to detect, because they don’t interact strongly with matter. Even if they are confirmed, however, they don’t necessarily mean that special relativity is incorrect. These results need to be confirmed, and I am rather skeptical that they will be. However, the first part of that previous statement is really, really important. If this observation is confirmed, it could deal a severe blow to Einstein’s special theory of relativity, which has an enormous amount of experimental confirmation. The OPERA detector at CERN (click for credit)The science media is abuzz with claims that scientists at the world’s largest particle physics lab (CERN) have observed subatomic particles traveling faster than the speed of light.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |